Mischna
Mischna

Talmud zu Moed Katan 3:1

וְאֵלּוּ מְגַלְּחִין בַּמּוֹעֵד, הַבָּא מִמְּדִינַת הַיָּם, וּמִבֵּית הַשִּׁבְיָה, וְהַיּוֹצֵא מִבֵּית הָאֲסוּרִין, וְהַמְנֻדֶּה שֶׁהִתִּירוּ לוֹ חֲכָמִים, וְכֵן מִי שֶׁנִּשְׁאַל לְחָכָם וְהֻתַּר, וְהַנָּזִיר, וְהַמְּצֹרָע הָעוֹלֶה מִטֻּמְאָתוֹ לְטָהֳרָתוֹ:

Und diese können sich bei Chol Hamoed rasieren: Einer, der aus dem Ausland zurückkehrt [bei Chol Hamoed, der vorher keine Zeit hatte, sich zu rasieren. Dies ist nur dann verboten, wenn er aus Handels- oder anderen Gründen ins Ausland ging, aber wenn er dies nur auf Tour tat, ist dies verboten.] Einer, der aus der Gefangenschaft befreit ist, einer, der aus dem Gefängnis befreit ist [selbst wenn er inhaftiert war von einem Israeliten, der ihm erlaubt hätte, sich zu rasieren (ungeachtet dessen, was er nicht rasiert hat), in Not zu sein], einer, der von den Weisen von seiner Exkommunikation befreit wurde [auf Chol Hamoed, der sich vorher nicht rasieren konnte und sich rasierte verboten für jemanden, der exkommuniziert wird]; Ebenso einer, der von einem Weisen (auf Chol Hamoed) von seinem Gelübde befreit wurde [sich nicht zu rasieren] [nachdem er keinen Weisen gefunden hatte, der dies vorher konnte; oder, bis dahin nicht in der Lage gewesen zu sein, "eine Öffnung für die Absolution" zu finden.] und einen Naziriten [der seinen Naziritismus auf Chol Hamoed vollendete] und einen Aussätzigen, der von Unreinheit zu Sauberkeit aufstieg. [Wenn sein siebter Tag auf Chol Hamoed fiel, darf er sich rasieren, nämlich. (3. Mose 14: 9): "Am siebten Tag wird er alle seine Haare rasieren." (Das Rasieren eines Nethek (eines blanchierten Flecks) wird nicht erwähnt, da es sich um eine geringfügige Aktivität handelt, bei der nur um den Fleck herum rasiert wird.) Der Grund, dass es allen außer den in unserer Mischna erwähnten verboten ist, sich auf Chol Hamoed zu rasieren, ist, dass sie es nicht tun Planen Sie dann, sich zu rasieren, wenn sie arbeitsfrei sind, und treten Sie unrasiert in den ersten Tag des Festivals ein. Und auch dies ist der Grund, warum es verboten ist, Kleidung auf Chol Hamoed zu waschen.]

Jerusalem Talmud Pesachim

24In addition to the Beṣah text (צ), this paragraph also is in Moˋed qaṭan 3:1 (81d line 27,ק). Babli 53a, Berakhot 19a, Beṣah23a. It was stated: Rebbi Yose said, Theudas of Rome led the people of Rome to eat helmeted kid-goat in the Passover nights, the Sages sent and said to him, if you were not Theudas, would we not put you in the ban? Who was Theudas? Rebbi Ḥananiah said, because he was providing for the rabbis. Are you not causing the public to eat sancta outside the Temple? And anybody causing the public to eat sancta outside the Temple has to be put in the ban.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Rosh Hashanah

“Rabban Gamliel sent to him, if you hinder the public you will make them stumble in the future.” Would you not hinder the public from performing a meritorious act? And any who would hinder the public from performing a meritorious act must be excommunicated279Cf. Mo`ed qatan 3:1, Ta`aniot3:12.. Rebbi Jehudah the baker280This attribution seems to be correct and the quote in the Babli 22a has to be corrected accordingly. said, Heaven forbid that Rebbi Aqiba was excommunicated; but it was the head of Gader281This name was introduced into the text by the corrector from the Babli. In the ms. ג()ר was written by the scribe; the middle letter was erased by the corrector and replaced by ד. Therefore the name certainly is incorrect, also because talmudic Gadara is on the East side of Lake Genezareth, far from the road to Jabneh. Therefore most likely the name is Gezer, a district capital on the road from Lydda to Jabneh. In the Babli one has to read גֶדֶֿר, with dh indistinguishable in sound from z. (Places Haggedera, Gederotaim, Gederot mentioned Jos. 15:37.41.); Rabban Gamliel sent and removed him from his headship.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Taanit

HALAKHAH: “Simeon ben Shataḥ sent to him and told him, you should be excommunicated.” For if there had been a decision made as it was decided in the days of Elijah106When the decision about rainfall was delegated by God to Elijah (1K. 17:1; cf. Sanhedrin 10:2, Notes 147ff.)., would you not have caused a desecration of the Name in public107If the decision had been given into the hands of another holy man, his prayer would have been ineffective and people would conclude that prayer is ineffective and stop praying.? And everybody who causes a public desecration of the Name must be excommunicated. [There, we have stated: Rabban Gamliel sent to him, if you hinder the public you will cause a deluge. Would you not hinder the public from performing a meritorious act? And any who would hinder the public from performing a meritorious act must be excommunicated.]108Corrector’s addition; totally garbled copy from Roš Haššanah 1:5, Note 279. He answered him, but does not the Holy One, praise to Him, cancel His decision because of the decision of a just person109This is the standard interpretation of Ps. 145:19, the pleasure of those who fear Him He will do and similar verses as explained in the next paragraph. Babli Mo`ed qaṭan 16b.? He said to him, [yes]110Corrector’s addition, unnecessary.. The Holy One, praise to Him, may cancel His decision because of the decision of a just person, but He will not cancel the decision of one just person because of the decision of his just colleague111This is the essence of the reference to Elijah..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Taanit

HALAKHAH: It was stated: “One does not answer ‘Amen’ in the Temple. What did they say? ‘Praised be the glory of His Kingdom forever and ever.’ And from where that one does not answer ‘Amen’ in the Temple? The verse says179Neh. 9:5., Arise, praise the Eternal, your God, forever and ever. From where for every single benediction? The verse says, and exalted over all praise and glory.180Tosephta 1:11. Babli 16b, Berakhot 63a, Soṭa40b; Yerushalmi Berakhot9:7 (Notes 278–280).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Ganzes KapitelNächster Vers